The Mitoplicator (fig. 1) produces nanosecond pulsed electromagnetic fields that are transferred by an antenna into a cell culture vial and the cells in a non-‐invasive way. Like in 3T3.L1 cells1 and Hybridoma2, nanosecond pulses were shown to increase the cell number in CHO-‐K1 cultures by 41%±4 (n=12) over control cultures at day 3 of culture3.
In this application note, CHO-‐K1 grown in flat tubes4 cells were treated once with Mitoplicator to evaluate cell number and morphology from seeding to confluence over a 10 day period.
CHO-‐K1 cells were trypsinized and seeded in Flat-‐sided tubes at low seeding density and allowed to adhere overnight prior to stimulation with Mitoplicator.
A single stimulation (day 0) of adherent CHO-‐K1 cells5 with Mitoplicator leads to growth curve that displays a head start versus control cell cultures (figure 2). The Mitoplicator-‐induced increase in cell proliferation becomes noticeable at day 2 and appears most clearly at day 3, when 28% more cells were counted in treated cultures. From day 4 to day 6, both cultures grow at the same rate, maintaining a head start of the Mitoplicator-‐treated cultures of 1/2 day.
From day 6 onward, the cultures reach confluence and converge to identical cell densities (treated is 101% of control at days 9 and 10). Microscopic evaluation of the cultures did not elicit morphological differences between treated and control monolayers throughout the culture period.
A single treatment of CHO-‐K1 cells elicits a boost of cell proliferation, which is most notable 3 days after the stimulation. Thereafter, cultures grow at similar rates, maintaining the head start of the treated cultures until confluence is reached.
Figure 2.
Overview of the CHO-‐K1 cell growth curves for control (open symbols) & Mitoplicator treated cultures (closed symbols). The values for day 8 are an interpolation.
Figure 3.
Detail of the CHO-‐K1 cell growth curves (day 2 to 5).
Cells. CHO-‐K1 (ATCC CCL-‐61) were cultured following ATCC guidelines5 in F-‐12 medium (Gibco, 21765-‐037) with 10% FBS (Gibco 10500-‐064) and 1% sodium pyruvate (Gibco, 11360-‐039). Cells were passaged twice weekly (1000 cells/cm2) and while harvested 50-‐80% confluent. 3ml of trypsinized, resuspended CHO-‐K1 cells were seeded (at 625 or 1250 cells/cm2) in 10ml tubes with a 6cm2 optically clear surface. Cells were allowed to adhere overnight prior to stimulation.
Stimulation. Prior to Mitoplicator treatment, tubes were coded. The handling before, during & after Accelerator treatment was as previously described4 and in accordance with the CHO-‐K1 ATCC culture guidelines5. Mitoplicator treatment conditions were 5 minutes at 50Hz. Following treatment, tube lids were opened and tubes placed in the incubator.
Cell counting. Monolayers were trypsinized, collected and cells were gently resuspended in medium containing 10% FBS. The number of cells was counted using a Burker-‐Turk counting chamber. Cell counting was done blind and in duplicate. The average of duplicates was recorded. Codes were broken after cell count results were recorded.
The Enhanced Cell Proliferation Reactor (ECPR) technology was discovered, validated & developed by the Vabrema founders since 2009 and in close collaboration with the Eindhoven Technical University (TU/e).
Today, ECPR technology is available for R&D purposes as the Mitoplicator™ instrument and for fermenter-‐scale cell or protein production (assay/engineering project).
Proof of principles for ECPR technology includes mammalian & human cell lines, primary cells & isolates, stem cells, plant seedlings, algae. Vabrema actively pursues an R&D plan, aiming at widening ECPR applicability.
Please inquire with us if ECPR technology could be to the benefit of your R&D or company value chain.